Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Reagan and abortion -- swerves in history

I worked for National Right to Life News in 1980-81, with Dave Gaetano, when Reagan won and Republicans took control of the Senate. I spoke with David Stockman after the election; he was a Reagan aide, and became Reagan’s Director of Office and Management and Budget. Stockman told me (and NRL News reported) that Reagan would not do much about the social issues any time soon, because he was going to focus on budget issues. So the work of pro-lifers to put Reagan in office was set aside, to make way for serious issues.

I covered (and fought) the nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor, who was “personally opposed” to abortion. Henry Hyde told NRL staff – not for publication, but I think that hold on the news has probably expired – that he had met with Reagan before Reagan formally announced the appointment, and had argued against it. Reagan said she was personally opposed. Hyde asked, “Did you ask about Roe v. Wade?” Reagan responded, “Roe v. Wade? What’s that?” So the opportunity to change the Court slipped away.

When it became clear that pro-lifers would not get much from the Republicans in the Senate and White House, I covered (and helped build) the second wave of pro-life nonviolence, sit-ins at abortion clinics all across the country. But that wave did not gather strength until a large number of pro-lifers gave up on political change as the heart of a pro-life strategy.

The election of Reagan did in fact save the lives of millions and millions of babies, overseas. I worked with Bill O’Reilly (not the TV figure), a CPA from Bethesda who had run accounting for the USPS under Kennedy. O’Reilly found that the World Bank was preparing to build 400 abortion clinics in Bangladesh – more precisely, to provide “menstrual regulation” in 400 new maternal and child health centers. (Abortion was illegal in Bangladesh, but menstrual regulation, using a glorified turkey baster, was not excluded.) O’Reilly was too ignorant to know at you couldn’t lobby the World Bank, so he did it. (My contribution: I made Bill’s presentation clear and comprehensible, in “The Deadly Neo-Colonialism.”) And he succeeded. A key (the key, probably) to his success was that the White House was full of pro-life activists, especially Anne Higgins in the Office of Correspondence. Anne and others persuaded the Secretary of Treasury (Donald Regan??) to intervene. The World Bank loan to Bangladesh was approved, but with a rider attached prohibiting the new MCH centers from offering turkey-baster services for women whose menses were weeks late. So although Reagan did not reverse Roe v. Wade, his election set the stage for saving millions of children in Bangladesh (one in six since 1985??). Nearly all were Muslim, of course, and probably some of those babies saved by Bill O’Reilly and his small team (including Fr. Marx at HLI, and Anne Higgins – whose power and influence depended on Reagan) went on to become mujahideen, killing Americans.

The population of Bangladesh is about 160 million. Over half have been born since Bill O’Reilly’s campaign on their behalf.


Reagan’s most solid pro-life success was not planned nor foreseen. It was overseas, protecting Muslims.